Unified threat intelligence & exposure platform
Know what threatens you.
Prove why it matters.
Intelligence, exposure, dark web, brand and vendor risk in one platform - with the evidence behind every conclusion. So the argument in your next review is about what to fix, not about whether the tool is right.
- CVE-2021-34473Exchange Server 2019Exploited89
- CVE-2024-21762FortiOS SSL-VPNExploited84
- CVE-2023-34362MOVEit TransferRansomware78
- CVE-2023-4966NetScaler ADCExploited71
- CVE-2024-3400PAN-OS GlobalProtectPoC68
- Critical14
- High27
- Medium63
- Low104
- Threat intelligence
- 32
- Exploitability
- 25
- Vulnerability profile
- 20
- Threat actor context
- 12
32 + 25 + 20 + 12 - the parts are the score.
Representative view of the console. Figures are illustrative - no customer data appears on this site.
Built for the whole security function - not just the SOC.
- Security leadersOne view of what threatens the business, and evidence that stands up in a board pack.
- IT and security managersA short, ranked list of what to fix this week - without a dedicated intelligence team.
- SOC and incident responseHunts that run in your console, cases with an audit trail, and indicators worth chasing.
- Intelligence analystsSourced records, tracked actors, and export to the tooling you already run.
- Risk and complianceControl coverage, an incident register with statutory clocks, and reports auditors accept.
- Service providersMultiple client environments, separated, from a single console.
The platform
Sixteen capabilities. One console. One bill.
Most teams assemble this from four or five products that do not talk to each other, then spend their week reconciling them. Here the intelligence, the exposure it creates, and the work it generates all live in the same place.
Intelligence
Malware & campaign intelligence
Families, behaviour and infrastructure, with the reporting behind each record.
Vulnerability intelligence
Vulnerability records enriched with exploitation status and a risk score that comes apart.
Threat actor tracking
Groups, aliases and activity, with the evidence supporting every attribution.
Indicator feed & lookup
A working indicator set, enriched on demand, with confidence that decays over time.
Exposure
Asset exposure
Which of your systems this week’s activity touches - with the evidence for each match.
Attack surface
What the internet already knows about your estate, discovered without touching it.
Vulnerability scanning
Inventory from your own estate, matched against exploited vulnerabilities.
AI attack surface
Exposed model endpoints, vector stores and leaked provider keys tied to your domains.
Digital risk
Dark web monitoring
Credential and breach exposure for your domains and people, checked continuously.
Brand protection
Lookalike domains and phishing against your brand - with takedown submission built in.
Ransomware leak sites
Leak-site victim listings matched against your organisation and your suppliers.
Third-party risk
A standing security posture for every vendor, from data the platform already holds.
Operations
Threat hunting
ATT&CK-mapped detection content in ten SIEM and EDR query languages.
Alerts & case management
Triage, ownership, SLA clocks and an audit trail on every case.
Compliance & audit
Control registers, an incident register with statutory clocks, and a shareable auditor report.
Reporting & briefings
Executive briefings, SOC operations reporting, and export to your own tooling.
What we commit to
Three guarantees, visible on every record.
Not values on a wall. Each of these is something you can check inside the product on day one of an evaluation - and something to hold us to if it ever stops being true.
- 01
Every published claim traces to its source.
Open any record and the source is on it. What you read is what that source actually said - not a plausible-sounding summary that drifted from it, and not an indicator, identifier or attribution the source never contained.
On the record: source, publication date, and the claim as the source made it.
- 02
A risk score you can take apart.
The score on a vulnerability is not a number you either accept or ignore. It resolves into four category totals that add up to it, each one arguable on its own - so a disagreement becomes “this part is wrong”, which is a conversation, instead of “the tool is wrong”, which is not.
On the record: the four totals, the arithmetic, and any analyst override.
- 03
The same inputs always produce the same answer.
Remediation priority is deterministic. Run it twice on the same estate and the same evidence and you get the same order both times - which is what lets you defend a decision in a post-incident review, or in front of an auditor, months after anyone remembers making it.
On the record: the evidence behind each recommendation, and when it changed.
Coverage
Broad enough to be useful. Narrow enough to trust.
Authoritative vulnerability and exploitation data on a continuous cycle, alongside the research and advisory reporting your analysts would otherwise read themselves - assessed, deduplicated across sources, and attributed back to where it came from.
Volume is easy and worth little. What matters is that a record earns its place: a bundle of indicators with no behaviour and no attribution is indicators, and it is filed as indicators - never dressed up as a malware family to make the numbers look better.
- Vulnerability record streams2Full CVE records, CVSS metrics and affected-product ranges
- Exploited-vulnerability catalogues2Confirmed in-the-wild exploitation, read as a union of two catalogues
- Exploitation-probability scoring1Daily probability that a CVE is exploited in the next 30 days
- Public exploit archives1Whether working exploit code exists, and how mature it is
- Adversary technique framework1Techniques, groups and software, synced from the published corpus
- Community malware and C2 trackers4Indicators, malicious URLs, confirmed samples and botnet C2 addresses
Detection
Hunts that open in your console, not in a text box.
Detection content arrives mapped to the ATT&CK technique it covers and written in your platform's own query language - using your index and your field names, with a link straight into your console. Not a snippet your analyst has to translate before it runs.
SIEM
KQLSPLSentinel KQLAQLYARA-LEDR & XDR
FQLMDE KQLS1QLCB QueryXQLCoverage is continuous on eight of the ten. Two are refreshed on a slower cycle for reasons outside our control - we would rather say so here than let you find out during an evaluation.
Exposure
“Does this affect us?” - with the evidence attached.
A feed of global threats is not intelligence about your estate. Nexaris shows which of your assets this week's activity actually touches, and names the evidence for every match so an analyst can agree or disagree with it.
The discipline that makes this usable is refusal. A page that flags everything gets ignored within a fortnight, so a match has to be defensible before it is shown - and anything you dismiss stays dismissed.
- Named assets, not categories.The specific systems affected, drawn from the inventory you maintain and from what is discoverable about your estate from the outside.
- Evidence on every match.Why this vulnerability is linked to this asset, in a form an analyst can check - and overturn, on the record, if it is wrong.
- Ranked by what it means for you.Ordered by exposure to your estate, not by the severity a vendor assigned to the world at large.
Data residency
Your telemetry answers the question. It doesn't leave.
Answering “are we affected?” normally means shipping your security telemetry into someone else's cloud. It does not here. A component you run inside your own environment answers the question locally and returns the answer - not the data behind it.
We can ask your environment a named question. We can never send it code, a query, or a script to run.
Outbound only
It polls us. There is no inbound port to open, no firewall change to request, and nothing listening on your network for us to reach.
Least data, by contract
Each question declares in advance the exact fields its answer may contain, and anything outside that list is removed before the answer is sent.
Read by default
Anything that would change state in your environment is refused unless you have explicitly approved that action.
Bring a CVE you already argued about.
The most useful evaluation is not a feature tour. Pick a vulnerability your team disagreed on, and we will walk through what the platform concluded, what evidence it held, and which of your assets it matched.